Question - reliability

1

Hello everyone!
I’m a new member and was wondering whether using the Chrome version or the app is more reliable. I currently have local checks running on about 10 sites every 5 seconds, and I’ve noticed that on a slower computer it doesn’t always check exactly every 5 seconds.

Is this expected behavior? Also, is there any way to increase the check frequency when running locally on a device?

Thanks in advance!

2

@justicy Thanks for reaching out, and welcome to Distill! Great questions — happy to clarify.

:white_check_mark: Reliability: Extension vs. Desktop App

Both the Chrome extension and the Desktop app are capable of running local monitors reliably. However, the Desktop app typically offers better stability and resource isolation, especially when running multiple monitors at high frequency. It’s often the preferred choice for intensive local monitoring setups like yours.

:stopwatch: 5-Second Checks on a Slower Machine

Yes, what you’re seeing is expected to some extent. While you can set the interval as low as 5 seconds, the actual execution depends on the available system resources:

  • If your computer is busy or underpowered, some checks may get delayed.

  • Chrome tabs and background scripts can also be throttled or paused by the browser when inactive, especially on laptops running in battery-saving mode.

The Desktop app tends to avoid this kind of throttling, which can lead to more consistent intervals, particularly on resource-constrained systems.

:chart_increasing: Increasing Check Frequency

5 seconds is the lowest interval available for local monitors, so you won’t be able to go any lower than that. But to make the most of it:

  • Use the Desktop app instead of just the browser extension.

  • Close unnecessary apps or tabs to free up CPU/RAM.

  • Assign the monitor to run on a device with better performance if possible.